Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 05:24
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
‘I think Xbox hardware is dead’, says Microsoft gaming veteran - Video Games Chronicle
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Turns Out, AI Gobbles Up a Lot of Energy - Newser
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Scientists stunned to observe that humpback whales might be trying to talk to us - ZME Science
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
DC Mayor Bowser’s message for Shakira after WorldPride cancellation: ‘Get yourself here’ - WTOP
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.